Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, July 31, 2015

The law cannot progress without courageous clients

Over the past month, the BC Supreme Court heard a landmark lawsuit involving the City of Abbotsford and members of its homeless community.
Pivot Legal Society is representing a group of individuals living homeless in Abbotsford seeking to protect their Charter-sanctioned rights and freedoms: the right to equality, the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the fundamental freedoms of association and assembly. The case is groundbreaking -- never before has a group of homeless Canadians been able to challenge the constitutionality of their treatment and displacement by a city's staff and police.

The Court would never have had the opportunity to hear this case were it not for the courage and determination of Pivot's clients, Barry Shantz and the BC/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors (DWS).
The six-week trial began on June 29, 2015. Since then, the Court has heard evidence detailing the degree to which the City of Abbotsford has attempted to displace Pivot's clients and other members of the City's vulnerable homeless and near-homeless citizenry. Evidence is intended to establish both the neglect and active cruelty that the City has carried out under the guise of bylaw enforcement.
The Court heard evidence of tents being cut and pepper sprayed by police, of chicken manure being dumped on a homeless encampment and of repeated displacements, despite there being no designated, lawful space for homeless individuals to inhabit. The Court also heard evidence about the lack of support and resources that take into account the complex interactions between addictions, mental illness and physical disability -- all of which influence and contribute to homelessness.
Abbotsford's homeless have been denied the basic necessities of life. Their existences have been effectively criminalized by bylaws that disproportionately affect those without access to permanent shelter. Unfortunately, their experiences are not isolated; they are embedded within years of marginalization and generations of colonialism, ableism and classism.
It is an understatement to say that this regime creates barriers to accessing Canada's justice system. Unfortunately, this too is the norm. As a result of those barriers, marginalized people are all too often denied the right to have their voices heard in Court outside of defending themselves against criminal charges; until now, our courts have rarely been positioned to consider the direct evidence of marginalized groups themselves. 
DJ Larkin is the housing campaigner for Pivot Legal Society. BC/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors (DWS) v City of Abbotsford is being heard by the BC Supreme Court until August 6, 2015.
Original Article
Source: rabble.ca/
Author:  DJ LARKIN 

No comments:

Post a Comment