Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Justin Trudeau: Tories threaten liberty by fostering prejudice against Muslims

The Conservative government poses a real threat to liberty in Canada and is stoking fear and prejudice by opposing the right of female Canadian Muslims to wear a niqab, Justin Trudeau says.

And Canadians, he said, should "shudder" that the government is employing the same kind of rhetoric to raise fears against Muslims that was used to promote a “none is too many” restrictive immigration policy toward Jews in the 1930s and 1940s.

"These are troubling times. Across Canada, and especially in my home province, Canadians are being encouraged by their government to be fearful of one another," the Liberal leader said in a speech in downtown Toronto Monday night.

"For me, this is both unconscionable and a real threat to Canadian liberty. For me, it is basic truth that prime ministers of liberal democracies ought not to be in the business of telling women what they can and cannot wear on their head during public ceremonies."

Trudeau, whose speech focused on the theme of liberty in Canada, was referring to the issue of Muslim women wearing the niqab, which covers their face, while taking the oath of citizenship.

Last month, a Federal Court judge ruled that the ban on people wearing face coverings while taking the oath of citizenship is unlawful.

But Prime Minister Stephen Harper denounced that decision, saying that most Canadians would consider it offensive that someone would conceal their identity at the moment they are becoming a citizen.

Harper said the government will appeal that ruling.

In his speech Monday night, Trudeau countered that people should be free to dislike the niqab, hold it up as a symbol of oppression, or convince others they shouldn’t wear one. But those who would use the state’s power to restrict women’s religious freedom and freedom of expression, he said, "indulge in the same repressive impulse that they profess to condemn."

"It is a cruel joke to claim you are liberating people from oppression by dictating in law what they can and cannot wear."

"What’s even worse than what they’re saying is what they really mean. We all know what is going on here. It is nothing less than an attempt to play on people’s fears and foster prejudice, directly toward the Muslim faith."

Trudeau also accused the government of deliberately blurring the line between real security threats and simple prejudice.

In response to Trudeau's speech, Harper spokesman Stephen Lecce said that Canada is a "beacon of freedom, an example of unity in diversity and successful model of pluralism in the world."

Regarding the niqab, Lecce repeated what Harper has said in the past, that Canadians would find it "offensive" that someone would conceal their identity while taking the citizenship oath, which is why the government is appealing the judge's decision.

Original Article
Source: CBC
Author: cbc

No comments:

Post a Comment