Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, October 24, 2014

Child Support Clawback Prevents Dad from Helping His Kids

Roy McMurter said a British Columbia government policy is preventing him from contributing fully to the well-being of his two daughters.

"I feel like I'm not allowed to be a contributor to my own family," said McMurter, a 44-year-old from Victoria whose children live in Surrey with their mother. "Now we're both being marginalized as parents trying to help their kids."

McMurter and his ex-wife separated about five years ago. He has a truck-driving job hauling construction equipment and contributes $750 a month in child support.

However, his ex-wife receives disability assistance from the provincial government, so the ministry claws back any support he provides to her, dollar for dollar. If she earned the amount of money he sends by working herself, she could keep up to $800 a month without it affecting her cheque.

The older daughter in the family lives with several disabilities and requires much care, McMurter said. "It calls for a lot of attention," he said. "It calls for a lot of one-on-one."

He said his ex-wife has worked hard to be able to look after their daughter. "It's my duty to support as much as I can as well," he said. "I've been pretty consistent about ensuring that I'm the best I can be to my children as a father."

Keeping the money he gives them would make a big difference to his children, said McMurter. "It would mean clothes, as simple as that. Shoes." As things are, the mother and two daughters live very sparely, splitting small portions of meat three ways, and can't afford to go anywhere, he said. "They go without."

The province's clawback policy sends the message that if you're poor, you don't matter, he said.

Change unaffordable: minister

Michelle Mungall, the B.C. NDP's critic for social development, raised McMurter's situation in the legislature during Wednesday's Question Period. "Mr. McMurter wants his money to go to his children," she said. "That's what the money is for."

Don McRae, the social development minister, acknowledged many people face challenges but said that income assistance is intended to be the payment of last resort.

The government is working to create jobs and grow the economy by doing things like promoting the export of natural gas, McRae said.

The minister said he is always looking for ways to reform policies, but added, "I'm not going to bring in a policy that we cannot afford at this time."

In the past, the NDP has said that changing the policy would cost about $17 million a year, a figure that was similar to the government's own estimate. The provincial operating budget is in the order of $45 billion a year, or about 2,600 times the amount required for the policy change.

"I'm grateful families are coming forward and showing how this policy impacts their lives," Mungall said after Question Period. The government is beginning to take notice, she said.

As part of a recent public consultation on disabilities, the government committed to consulting further on changing the clawback policy, but has yet to provide any details, Mungall said.

Last week, three single mothers, their children and the Single Mothers' Alliance of B.C. Society filed a legal challenge to the policy in provincial Supreme Court arguing it's unfair to take back money that's intended to help children.

Original Article
Source: thetyee.ca/
Author: Andrew MacLeod

No comments:

Post a Comment