Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Sunday, November 03, 2013

Food Stamp Cut Reverberates Across Country

WASHINGTON -- National media and federal policymakers haven't paid much attention, but a $5 billion reduction to the food stamp program that took effect Friday has already been reverberating across the country.

Food bank directors have been telling local newspapers and TV stations they're worried the shrinking benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will result in rising need at a time of decreased donations.

"It's coming right before the holidays, and it's coming right before it gets cold outside," Melissa Henderson of South Plains Food Bank told the local Fox affiliate in Lubbock, Texas.

"I think we're going to be swamped and it really worries me," Sharon Miller, director of Our Savior Lutheran Food Bank in Lansing, Mich., told WILX. "A lot of them have trouble getting by now even with the food stamps. And if they cut it, what are they going to do for food?"

"That’s going to be a significant hit for families; we already know SNAP doesn’t last the whole month," Rebecca Brislain, executive director of the Florida Association of Food Banks, told The News Service of Florida.

Though the cutback has received scant attention from national media -- liberal watchdog Media Matters reported Wednesday that cable and national broadcast news have been silent about it -- local newspapers and TV stations have produced no fewer than 103 stories on the topic this week, according to HuffPost's count.

The reduction affects all 47 million Americans enrolled in the program. Benefits will drop according to household size; individuals will lose $11, while a family of four receiving the maximum benefit will get $36 less per month. The local news coverage often mentions that Republicans are seeking additional food stamp cuts in ongoing farm bill negotiations. The House of Representatives passed a bill earlier this year that wouldn't reduce benefit levels, but would save money by pushing 3.8 million Americans off the rolls in 2014.

Friday's reduction, however, is the result of Democratic legislation that hastened the expiration of a 13.6 percent benefits boost provided by the 2009 stimulus bill. In 2010, congressional Democrats used the food stamp money to pay for other spending priorities. Though this week Democrats have offered token legislation to prevent the cut, they have broken the promises they made in 2010 to replace the money before the cut could take effect. At $5 billion, it's an annual reduction 25 percent larger than what has been sought by Republicans. Experts say it's the first-ever month-to-month benefit decrease for the SNAP program.

Some local news outlets have interviewed food stamp recipients about what's happening. Lance Worth of Olympia, Wash., told the Bellingham Herald that he and his 12-year-old daughter are unsure how they'll make the adjustment. Worth is anticipating $20 less per month.

"Before the cut, it was kind of an assumption you were going to the food bank anyway," Worth said. "I guess I’m just going to go $20 hungrier -- aren’t I?”

Lupe Gonzalez told Eyewitness News in Bakersfield, Calif., that she relies on $93 in food stamps to feed her family of four.

"It means a lot to me, because it's hard, it's hard what I get, it's not enough for my kids," Gonzalez said. "I'm telling you, by the end of the month there's nothing … rice and beans, whatever we can afford."

"It was already so hard to start off with," Japonica Thompson, a mother of two in West Baton Rouge, La.,told the Times-Picayune. "Believe me when I tell you, there is nothing wasted in my house. We cannot afford to waste."

Military.com, a news site serving the armed services community, reported that nearly a million veterans and 5,000 active duty troops would be affected. A Defense Department spokesman told the site active duty members receiving SNAP tend to be in junior pay grades with larger-than-average households.

Joye Raezer, executive director of the National Military Families Association, put it this way: "It's a small population but it's a vulnerable population."

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.com
Author:  Arthur Delaney 

No comments:

Post a Comment