Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Government Departments Facing 10% Budget Cuts

Most government departments have been told to prepare for cuts to their budgets of around 10%, it has emerged.

Schools, the NHS and international aid will continue to remain protected but most other funding is expected to be slashed in 2015/16, government sources confirmed.

The Ministry of Defence, which Philip Hammond warned earlier this year would struggle to take any more cuts, is likely to get a 1% real terms increase in its equipment budget and a 5% reduction on the rest.

Treasury chief secretary Danny Alexander has written to each department setting out "planning assumptions" ahead of the Comprehensive Spending Review, which is due before the end of June.

To meet the £11.5bn savings target most departments have been warned to expect a 10% funding reduction.

That gives the Treasury some wriggle room for finalising cuts that are likely to amount to around 8-9% once negotiations have been finalised.

School funding will remain protected but the rest of the Department for Education's budget faces a 10% cut.

The government is committed to spending 0.7% of national income on aid, which will be met, but the rest of the Department for International Development's budget - mainly for administration - will be subject to cuts.

A Treasury spokesman said: "The chief secretary has today written to departments to set their planning assumptions for the 2015/16 spending round. Setting planning assumptions is a normal part of the spending round process. These are planning assumptions that allow flexibility, not final decisions."

The spending review comes against a backdrop of unrest among some sections of the Cabinet - dubbed the 'National Union of Ministers' - who are resistant to further big cuts to their departments.

Lib Dem business secretary Vince Cable and Tory home secretary Theresa May and communities secretary Eric Pickles are all believed to have made their concerns known.

Earlier this year Mr Alexander slapped down calls for welfare to bear more of the burden of the coalition's austerity cuts.

Shadow Treasury minister Chris Leslie said: "David Cameron and George Osborne never wanted or expected this spending review to happen.

"They said their plan would balance the books by the next election, but their failure to deliver economic growth means there is now set to be a deficit of over £90 billion in 2015/16. That's the reason why the Treasury is now looking for even more spending cuts and tax rises.

"Yet instead of asking what's gone wrong and what needs to be done to get the economy growing strongly, the chancellor decided in the Budget to stick with the same old failing policies and a tax cut for millionaires."

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.co.uk
Author: PA

No comments:

Post a Comment