Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Andrew Cash: Harper Conservatives Are Afraid Of Librarians

New Democrat Andrew Cash wants to know why Heritage Minister James Moore and other Harper Conservatives are so terrified.. of librarians.

The Toronto MP rose in Question Period on Monday afternoon to shine a light on a controversial new code of conduct at Library and Archives Canada that some fear will muzzle federal librarians.

“According to the Conservatives, there is a new threat: librarians,” he said to some laughs. “And their ‘high risk activities.’ Activities like teaching and conferences.”

The document says that federal librarians and archivists who attend conferences, visit classrooms or speak at public meetings are engaging in “high risk activities” and must receive clearance from their department.

Cash says the code of conduct even requires “duty of loyalty” to the Conservative government.

"Now I have always suspected that facts and science stirs the fear in the hearts of some members opposite,” Cash said. “But why is the minister so afraid of librarians?”

Moore tried to downplay the question with some humour.

“Yes, frightening,” he said, jokingly throwing his hands up. “Very frightened of librarians.”

Moore told Cash that he should direct his questions to Daniel Caron, head of Library and Archives Canada.

“The member should know as well that Library and Archives Canada operates at arm's-length,” he said. “We were not consulted on the code of conduct.”

But while Moore may not think the code of conduct is such a big deal, some librarians and archivists beg to differ.

University of Toronto archivist Loryl MacDonald told The National Post that the code is already having a “chilling” effect on federal librarians and archivists, who used to be encouraged to interact with groups.

“It is very disturbing and disconcerting to have included speaking at conferences and teaching as so-called ‘high risk’ activities,” she said.

Of course, this isn’t the first time the Harper Conservatives have been accused of “muzzling” thinkers.

According to numerous reports, federal scientists, particularly those in Environment Canada, Natural Resources and Fisheries and Oceans, now need permission from the government to share their findings in public.

The Tories also want foreign researchers to sign "restrictive" new research agreements that limit how they share information.

American oceanographer Andrea Muenchow, who collaborates with Canadian federal scientists on Arctic research, posted a scathing critique on his personal blog last month.

"I believe this is disturbing political climate change," he said. "I feel that it threatens my academic freedom and potentially muzzles my ability to publish data and interpretation and talk timely on science issues of potential public interest without government interference."

READ THE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA CODE OF CONDUCT

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.ca
Author: The Huffington Post Canada

No comments:

Post a Comment