Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Sequester Would Chop Long-Term Unemployment Insurance

WASHINGTON -- If the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration take effect as expected at the beginning of March, long-term unemployed Americans receiving federal unemployment insurance will see their weekly benefit checks reduced by 9.4 percent.

"Affected long-term unemployed individuals would lose an average of more than $400 in benefits that they and their families count on while they search for another job," the White House said recently on its website.

"Smaller unemployment checks will also have a negative impact on the economy as a whole," the White House said. "Economists have estimated that every dollar in unemployment benefits generates $2 in economic activity."

More than two million unemployed Americans currently receive federal "Emergency Unemployment Compensation," which kicks in for jobless workers who use up the standard six months of state-funded benefits before finding new jobs (some states, such as Florida and Georgia, offer fewer initial weeks of aid). State benefits will not be affected by the cuts. The average weekly amount is $300.

The National Association of State Workforce Agencies said in a bulletin to states last week that the U.S. Labor Department had notified them that they would have to implement the changes starting March 3 if Congress fails to act. A host of other department functions will also be affected, according to a Feb. 1 letter from acting Labor Secretary Seth Harris to Congress.

The smaller federal unemployment checks are just one of many ways the sequester will hurt American families and the broader economy, according to the Obama administration. After March 1, low-income seniors will receive 400 million fewer meals from federally-assisted charities. More than half a million women and children will be dropped from a nutrition program. Roughly 125,000 families will see their rental assistance threatened, and more than 100,000 formerly homeless Americans may be tossed out on the streets.

Those cuts represent only a small part of the sequester, which will chop $85 billion from the federal budget this year by reducing defense spending by 7.3 percent and non-defense spending by 5.1 percent. The Congressional Budget Offices estimates it could lead to the loss of 750,000 jobs in 2013 alone.

Over 10 years, the cuts amount to more than $1 trillion. Republicans in Congress agree with Democrats that the policy is terrible, but disagree over how to replace it. Both sides seem seemed resigned to the prospect of the its taking effect.

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.com
Author: Arthur Delaney

No comments:

Post a Comment