Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Money will always flow to the oilsands

There are many reasons we should think hard about whether to approve CNOOC’s bid for Calgary oil company Nexen. Getting cut off from capital we need to develop our resources isn’t one of them.

Especially in the wake of Ottawa’s turning down of Malaysia’s Petronas’ bid for Progress Corp., hand-wringing is the order of the day in the business community as the deadline looms for Ottawa’s ruling on the Nexen transaction. These decisions are creating uncertainty that will make oil companies very reluctant to invest in Canadian natural resources, is the constant refrain from investment firms, financial journalists and the oilpatch itself.

I’ve been known to make these arguments myself. All other things being equal, companies will prefer to deal with places where the rules are known and operate transparently and whose outcome is reasonably predictable. Let’s grant that that is not how one would describe the conditions for foreign investment in Canadian natural resources after Ottawa’s thumbs-down on Petronas and BHP Billiton’s bid for Potash Corp. in Saskatchewan a couple of years ago.

Still, the Nexen deal is one that could have long-term consequences for Canada, because if approved it will form the template for bids that further state-owned Chinese oil companies will make for other oilpatch assets. We are not approving a single transaction, but deciding whether we open the door to a significant change of ownership and control in the entire industry.

Is Canada sending conflicting signals, claiming on the one hand we are open for business and on the other looking askance at CNOOC? We can be open for business but draw the line at “businesses” that are nothing of the sort, but are really agents of a foreign government and a rather intemperate, impetuous government at that. Just because you are in the market for investors, doesn’t mean you give up the right to distinguish between capital from a chartered bank, pension fund or the stock market on the one hand, and the Mafia on the other. We are entitled to know who we are dealing with.

Let’s suppose that we decide CNOOC and other Chinese state-owned oil enterprises aren’t people we really care to do business with, perhaps because they are Iran sanctions-busters, or they’re best buddies with Sudan’s ruthless regime or their parent company, China Inc., has a wretched record of stealing the intellectual property of western companies and is engaged in active espionage against Canadian companies and governments, or any one of a number of other reasons. Will our access to capital to develop our natural resources dry up?

If it did, it would certainly deal a mortal blow to Canada’s hopes to turn its natural resources into the foundation stone of a thriving economy. The opportunity that the natural resource economy offers us to achieve reconciliation with aboriginal peoples would be imperilled. A vast source of tax revenue would be lost. We would be undeniably impoverished.

How likely is it, then, that sending China packing would unleash these dire consequences?

The likelihood is approximately zero.

Consider that, according to the Alberta government’s official website, the oilsands will require about $218 billion in capital investment over the next 25 years. Sounds like a lot. But it’s less than $10 billion a year. By contrast, says Wikipedia, the assets of the global fund management industry increased 10 per cent in 2010 (the latest year for which we have figures) to reach a record $79.3 trillion. So this global pool of capital increases by roughly $7 trillion to $8 trillion a year. And the oilsands need a microscopic 0.14 per cent of that.

The world is not short of capital. It is awash in capital hungry for a decent return. The oilsands need billions in investment. In exchange, investors will be able to turn into cash the third-largest reserves of oil in the world. There is good money in bitumen. That will ensure that the capital needed to develop those resources is forthcoming.

Remember, too, that oil companies the world over invest in circumstances far more trying than Canada’s humble foreign investment review process. Oil companies endure the risks of armed rebellion, insurrection, kidnapping of executives, corrupt officials, uncompensated nationalizations and far worse. BP’s leading executive in Russia had to flee the country in 2008 in fear for his safety. In Nigeria, armed gangs attack Shell’s pipelines and other facilities. And still the companies come.

Go to Calgary and you will find companies from all over the world (France’s Total, Britain’s BP, America’s Exxon Mobil, Norway’s Statoil and more). As long as there is money to be made, capital will flow in and oil will flow out.

We should judge China’s proposed investments on their merits, not because we fear they cannot be replaced. They can.

Original Article
Source: ottawa citizen
Author: Brian Lee Crowley

No comments:

Post a Comment