Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, June 02, 2012

Quebec Premier Jean Charest tells student groups they’re ‘hurting Quebecers’

MONTREAL—Quebec Premier Jean Charest is accusing student groups of “hurting Quebecers” as they take to the streets to protest the recent breakdown in talks with the government.

With Montreal’s Grand Prix weekend less than a week away, Charest expressed concern that student groups would disrupt the international event, which brings millions of dollars to the province each year.

He said students, who have spent almost four months striking against a proposed tuition hike, should leave Grand Prix fans alone given the financial importance of the race.

The latest round of talks collapsed Thursday afternoon when Charest’s education minister, Michelle Courchesne, declared the two sides had reached an “impasse.”

Around 10,000 students took to the streets of Montreal that night to decry the government’s decision to give up on negotiations. A much smaller crowd did the same in Quebec City.

“It’s all well and good to protest against Jean Charest, to protest against the government,” Charest said Friday while visiting a suburb west of Montreal.

“But they’re in the process of hurting Quebecers and the people from whom they’re seeking support. I think they have to examine their consciences when it comes to their acts.

“If they had a message to get across, I think we can conclude it has been received.”

Charest’s warning comes at a critical time for the main student groups. One of the most visible, and moderate, leaders stepped down on Friday as his two-year mandate expired.

Leo Bureau-Blouin, who headed an association of college students known as FECQ, will be replaced by 19-year-old Eliane Laberge. Bureau-Blouin had been praised in many circles for his even-handed leadership amid rising tensions.

“I hope that Ms. Laberge can succeed where I failed, that is in finding a solution to the conflict,” Bureau-Blouin said Friday.

A more hardline student association, the CLASSE, has been busy preparing for what it hopes will be a large demonstration in Montreal on Saturday.

It has also invoked the possibility of using the Grand Prix as a platform for the student cause.

The government claims one of the group’s spokespeople, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, threatened during the latest round of negotiations to disrupt the event. Nadeau-Dubois has said the group would not prevent people from going to the race.

At the Thursday night demonstration in Montreal, members of an anti-capitalist group handed out pamphlets calling on demonstrators to make their presence known during Grand Prix weekend.

Charest’s Liberal government passed emergency legislation last month aimed at calming student protests, which have at times turned violent.

Student leaders can face stiff fines under the law for supporting illegal demonstrations, and Charest said Friday it is up to student leaders to establish the parameters of their protests.

“These people have the ultimate responsibility and I expect them to assume it totally,” Charest said.

The emergency law has been used sparingly. Several of its provisions have been criticized by legal experts and human rights activists, who say they harm such rights as freedom of association.

Original Article
Source: the star
Author: CP

No comments:

Post a Comment