hereIf the Supreme Court
strikes down all or part of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare,
it will undoubtedly cement the Roberts court's reputation as the most conservative in years. That's not an entirely a matter of opinion. Thanks to an amazing trove of data collected by law professors Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn and the Supreme Court Database, the court's rightward trajectory can be confirmed.
The Roberts court's conservative makeup doesn't always translate into conservative rulings, however. In 2010, slightly more than half of its decisions were conservative according to the Supreme Court Database. (See here for more details on how it defines liberal and conservative.) In fact, when all nine justices are in agreement, their rulings have been right down the middle. However, when the vote splits, the court's rulings veer back to the right.
Original Article
Source: mother jones
Author: Dave Gilson
By several measures, the court headed by Chief Justice John Roberts
is the most conservative since the early 1970s, when Richard Nixon named
Warren Burger to replace the famously liberal Earl Warren. Not only is
its most conservative member (Clarence Thomas) nearly as conservative as
the Burger court's most conservative member (future Chief Justice
William Rehnquist), its most liberal member (Ruth Bader Ginsburg) is
considerably less liberal than previous justices on the left side of the
spectrum.
Looking at individual members of the Roberts
court also shows a rightward shift in its ranks. Between 2005 and 2010,
most of its five conservative-leaning members became more so.
Additionally, liberal Justices John Paul Stevens and David Souter were
replaced by Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who may turn out to be less
liberal than their predecessors.
The Roberts court's conservative makeup doesn't always translate into conservative rulings, however. In 2010, slightly more than half of its decisions were conservative according to the Supreme Court Database. (See here for more details on how it defines liberal and conservative.) In fact, when all nine justices are in agreement, their rulings have been right down the middle. However, when the vote splits, the court's rulings veer back to the right.
The Supreme Court data also provides context for some of the most anticipated aspects of the impending Obamacare ruling:
How will the vote split? Court watchers predict
that the court will either vote against Obamacare 5-4 or uphold it 6-3.
Nearly a quarter of its cases have been decided by 5-4 votes, usually
resulting in a win for the conservative majority. Though not uncommon,
6-3 votes are less frequent in the Roberts court than in previous
courts.
Will the court find the law unconstitutional? Between 1803, when the Supreme Court first exercised the right of judicial review, and 1857, the Supreme Court declared only one federal law unconstitutional.
In its first five years, the Roberts found seven acts of Congress
unconstitutional, including swaths of the McCain-Feingold campaign
finance law in Citizens United.
Yet during that time, it did not nullify federal laws at a higher rate
than recent courts. And according to the Supreme Court Database, most of
its rulings of unconstitutionality could be considered liberal leaning.
Will the court break with legal precedent?
Likewise, between 2005 and 2010, the Roberts court respected precedent
as much (or as little) as most of its predecessors. However, when it
overruled existing Supreme Court rulings, it overwhelmingly used a
conservative reasoning for its actions.
How does the court view the Commerce Clause? The court's health care decision will hinge on its reading of the Constitution's Commerce Clause,
which gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. Between
2005 and 2010, the Roberts case heard three cases involving the clause;
in all three, its rulings were not conservative.
Will the court defer to the administration?
Historically, the federal government has a pretty good odds of winning
when it's before the Supreme Court. As seen below, its batting average
has been dropping in the Roberts court. Obama has been having a
particularly hard time getting traction with the high court: UCLA law
professor Adam Winkler has found that the court has ruled against the current White House in more than half of cases directly involving the federal government.
Will the court mention broccoli? The much despised vegetable has become a symbol of the health care showdown,
particularly the argument that forcing Americans to buy insurance is an
unconstitutional federal power grab. Broccoli was mentioned eight times during oral arguments (Justice Antonin Scalia first brought it up). The New Yorker puts the odds of a broccoli mention in the majority opinion at 1-3.
Should Scalia or his colleagues cite broccoli,
it will be unprecedented: The only other broccoli reference in Supreme
Court decisions between 1791 and 2005 was in a R-rated appendix to a
1978 case involving a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "seven dirty words" routine.
Source: mother jones
Author: Dave Gilson
No comments:
Post a Comment