Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, April 13, 2012

Pete Hoekstra On Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: 'That Thing Is A Nuisance'

WASHINGTON -- Former Republican congressman Pete Hoekstra, who is now running to unseat Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), weighed in on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on Thursday, saying the law was a "nuisance" that shouldn't be in place.

The issue came up during a campaign event in Royal Oak, Mich. An attendee asked whether Hoekstra would support or "work to repeal" the law if elected to office.

"Will, you know, will repealing it be a priority? If you came back and said, you know, that's really the thing that's hurting my business the most. My guess is there are other things that we can do that have a higher priority in terms of what I, what I believe might need to be done. I think you know we need to create -- that thing is a nuisance. It shouldn't be the law," replied Hoekstra.

Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law in 2009 and considers it one of the key achievements of his presidency. The law -- which was heavily opposed by Republicans -- provides women with more legal channels through which to pursue equal pay for equal work. Hoekstra, at the time a congressman, voted against the measure when it came up in the House of Representatives, believing that federal legislation was not needed and it would burden small businesses during the economic recession.

“It's insulting to women and their families that Pete Hoekstra thinks a law that guarantees equal pay for equal work is a nuisance and should be repealed,” said Mark Brewer, chair of the Michigan Democratic Party. "When women are discriminated against, and paid less for the same job, it damages our economy and our community. Repealing this absolutely critical protection for women would be yet another blow against middle class families fighting to make ends meet."

“This is a desperate attack that Debbie Stabenow's political henchmen are resorting to because they can't defend her failed economic policies that have hurt the women of this state," replied Hoekstra campaign spokesman Paul Ciaramitaro. "The real issue is who is going to have the better agenda for all Michiganders and on every key issue -- from controlling spending to spurring economic growth to establishing energy independence -- Pete Hoekstra offers a bold new vision while Debbie Stabenow campaigns on more of the same."

"Democrats like Debbie Stabenow are trying to change the subject after refusing to distance themselves from the disgusting attacks on Ann Romney," he added, referring to the comments made by Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen (who, in full disclosure, was once employed by The Huffington Post). Many prominent Democrats, however, have indeed disavowed Rosen's remarks.

The candidate ran into controversy recently when he aired an anti-Stabenow ad during the Super Bowl that was widely considered to be racially insensitive.

Original Article
Source: Huff
Author: Amanda Terkel

No comments:

Post a Comment