Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Monday, January 23, 2012

CARC tells Pipeline Developers “Beef Up Assessment of Pipeline Impacts”

The Canadian Arctic Resources Committee is calling on the proponents of the Mackenzie Valley Gas Project to rework their assessment of the impacts of their proposed pipeline. The almost 1,400 kilometre pipeline would stretch from the Arctic Coast to the Alberta border and would be the biggest industrial development the north has ever seen. The project is in the late stages of a review by the Joint Review Panel that will make recommendations to the federal government on if or how the project should go ahead.

In giving evidence to the panel today in Yellowknife, CARC representatives told the panel that the pipeline developers have done a woeful job of predicting the cumulative effects of the pipeline. “The developers are planning a pipeline that can carry more gas than they have yet discovered,” says Chuck Birchall, chair of CARC. “Despite this fact, they are not making any real attempt at describing the massive effects of exploring for and developing additional gas deposits. If there is to be a hope of adequately planning for those effects, the proponent must do a better job of trying to anticipate them.”

CARC presented its own mapping work to the panel, mapping that shows certain development scenarios will likely have negative impacts on large animals such as caribou. CARC’s work shows that in the Mackenzie delta, the amount of disturbance from development is already approaching the level at which there is concern for the future. The loss of habitat could be catastrophic for northern peoples who traditionally rely heavily on hunting for subsistence.

The panel is set to wrap up its public hearings this fall. “We hope the panel will direct the proponents of this project to go back to the drawing board, and make a much better attempt to describe the cumulative effects of this project,” adds Birchall. “Without that information, we really do not see how the panel can make an informed decision.”

CARC’s official submission to the review panel (5MB PDF)

Original Article
Source: carc.org  
Author: carc 

No comments:

Post a Comment