Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

The newcomers numbers game: Jason Kenney’s balancing act

The mastermind of the Conservative strategy to woo new Canadians during the last federal election launched the West Coast leg of a tour to re-examine Canada’s immigration system – one that is likely to recalibrate the way newcomers are admitted into the country.

Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney was in Vancouver on Tuesday asking agencies that work with immigrants, as well as academics and community leaders, to weigh how Canada should adjust its immigrant intake, both in total numbers and in the mix of immigrants selected.

For the past decade, Canada has accepted roughly 250,000 new permanent residents annually, but that number jumped in 2010 to more than 280,000, the highest total in more than 50 years. As Canada’s population ages, some advocates have suggested Canada should ramp up its immigrant intake to more than 300,000 a year. But the issue is hotly contested by those who argue that recent immigrants have fared badly in the labour force.

Mr. Kenney, the politician credited with delivering the immigrant-populated seats that sealed a Conservative majority, kicked off the consultations in Alberta last week and will be in Toronto Wednesday and Montreal on Friday. He faces a delicate balancing act. Public support for immigration remains high, but polling shows a very limited appetite for increasing immigration levels. And, as Mr. Kenney pointed out Tuesday, studies suggest Canada would need to triple or quadruple its immigration levels to maintain its current ratio of workers to old-age dependents.

“Simply put, we do not have the resources or ability to integrate a million new immigrants every year,” Mr. Kenney said. “We can’t teach them English or French. We can’t flood our taxpayer-funded services like health care and public education. We can’t put such high pressure on housing and real-estate markets.”

Debbie Douglas, executive director of the Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants, is one of those calling for Canada’s immigrant intake to climb above 300,000 a year.
“Last year was telling. We were able to land 280,000 immigrants. We have the capacity,” Ms. Douglas said. “For me it’s about political will, and we’re at a time when economically we need more immigrants.”

Ms. Douglas said Canada must place more emphasis on permanent migration. She’s opposed to the policy of accepting increasing numbers of temporary foreign workers in Canada, who have a difficult path to citizenship and must leave the country after four years. There are more than 300,000 temporary foreign workers in Canada at present.

She also wants to see steps taken to reduce the backlog of family reunification applications from parents and grandparents. Mr. Kenney was criticized during the recent election campaign for waiting times that had grown to several years.

Full Article
Source: Globe & Mail 

No comments:

Post a Comment