Is Industrial Agriculture Really the Answer?

In a world where hunger and obesity co-exist, the problem is more about equity than shortage.

We often assume the only way to feed the world’s rapidly growing human population is with large-scale industrial agriculture. Many would argue that genetically altering food crops is also necessary to produce large enough quantities on smaller land areas to feed the world’s people.

But recent scientific research is challenging those assumptions. Our global approaches to agriculture are critical. To begin, close to one billion people are malnourished, and many more are finding it difficult to feed their families as food prices increase. But is large-scale industrial farming the answer?

Large industrial farms are energy-intensive, using massive amounts of fossil fuels for machinery, processing, and transportation. Burning fossil fuels contributes to climate change, and the increasing price of oil is causing food prices to rise. Deforestation and plowing also release tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, contributing further to climate change. Furthermore, industrial farms require more chemical inputs, such as pesticides and fertilizers.

Agriculture also affects the variety of plant and animal species in the world. According to a review of scientific literature by Michael Jahi Chappell and Liliana Lavalle, which was published in the journal Agriculture and Human Values, agricultural development is a major factor in the rapid decline in global biodiversity.
Full Article
Source: The Mark